Won’t Somebody Think Of [Smacking] The Children?

Posted: 07/03/2011 in General

I read an article during the nominally historic period just after the 2010 federal election, shortly after the independent actors in the federal lower house had their glowing regigenetic moment in the sun, carrying the hopes of a nation like no-one since Phar-Lap, in the process making deals to, among other things, bring about a better tone in the houses of parliament. Everybody was full of high hopes for a new era. The cynics sneered.
The article contained reference to a political observer from the UK observing our lower house during Question Time. He commented that he couldn’t believe the atrocious conduct. One of the local journos responded that if he thought this was bad, he should have seen it prior to the “new era”.
This should be a national embarrassment, nay, outrage. Over the past week it seems to have deteriorated even further.

The behaviour we see from our politicians would not be tolerated in any other sphere of life. We expect higher standards of behaviour from our kids at school, in dealing with people in public from day to day, and in the workplace. Especially in the workplace. In that context, it would not be unreasonable to expect someone to be disciplined for such an abandonment of acceptable standards.

One of the gaps between theory & implementation, and hence central flaws, in Democracy, is the basic assumption that ultimate accountability awaits at the ballot box. This is supposed to be the grand remedy, the ultimate balancing factor. Get rid of those that do not perform or who fail to implement the public’s will. Sadly, it’s not that simple.

We have what is largely a binary democratic system in this country – we either pick Option A or Option B. There is of late some fuzziness around the edges with the independents and Greens gaining the balance of power in the lower house – a novelty which, while refreshing at the time, may not capture the imagination of the electorate in a sustained fashion. Time will tell. But this, despite the best of intentions, didn’t appear to change the basic reality.
The result of this binary system is that if in any respect both sides are as bad as each other, there is basically no hope for improvement in that context, and the accountability-at-the-ballot-box theory goes out the window. This strikes at the heart of the touted benefits of democracy. Candidate parties don’t need to be particularly principled, they just need to be the least worst, and often not by much of a margin.
This situation is not helped by a political media which tacitly accepts this situation in a fatalistic kind of way. They get to know the players and their general levels of performance, and allow them to maintain a kind of minimum status quo instead of enforcing on our behalf higher standards, the role they claim to occupy in the political process, and they way they justify their existence. In any case, there’s no point in them pursuing the offenders because they’re all as bad as each other. So the system is fundamentally broken in this respect.

If the fundamental assumption of accountability-at-the-ballot-box is broken in this way – in that there are aspects of political behaviour that cannot be enforced by the electorate in this way – then we mustn’t capitulate to this. We need to force the issue. The only way to do this is to co-opt the media into making parliamentary behaviour an election issue. Not in a fleeting, politically expedient sense, either. We need to yell at our pollies to legislate to enforce a minimum standard of behaviour.
The idea is in a way laughable, but is it so different to any other election issue? If the media’s attention can be gotten – probably unlikely given their generally self-interested ethos (after all, what have they got to gain from less entertaining politics?) – not all that different from those that they claim to police, unfortunately (quis custodiet ipsos custard indeed) – then just maybe it could become one of these national discussions the pollies are so in favour of us having when it distracts from their peccadilloes.

Never has the federal electoral situation been so conducive to getting community priorities addressed. An election could well be triggered early, because our mainstream political parties *really* don’t like being dictated to by the independents & the Greens, and as soon as one side decides they have enough electoral petrol in the tank they will attempt to force an election. Ergo, any issue in which they can grab the initiative will be like gold to them.

It will probably never happen. But with the new power of social media, it’s nice to play What If. What if the net commentariat took this up to the powers that be? What if the media was pressured into getting this issue onto the national agenda? What if we forced our politicians to behave like the decorous, professional adults we deserve?

It’s a nice thought. That’s what I would call Democracy.

  1. Steve,
    Great article even though I may disagree with a couple of points.
    Firstly – Australia isn’t a democracy, it is a republic (just not a constitutional one). I would never vote for this country to become a constitutional republic because there are copious amounts of morons out there who think it will solve all our problems. It will not.
    They say it is a way to cut ties with England and to grow up. If this country is to grow up, that would require maturity – something that is neither present after hours in any city where alcohol is present nor in parliament (at any level).
    My fear with becoming a republic has nothing to do with the royal family and everything to do with letting a pack of brainless meatheads (like those that constantly get voted in to run this country) get their hands on the constitution. If one thing is blatantly obvious and known by all (argued by moonbats) is that you can bet your arse and every single thing you own and hold dear (besides your arse 🙂 that the Australian People will NOT gain rights under a revised constitution.

    Take the US constitution as an example…. Freedom of speech. We don’t have that now and it is merely implied. If we get anything along those lines, it will be severely limited. How about a biggie from where I stand? The right to bear arms (not the right to arm bears 🙂 As it stands in this country RIGHT NOW, you are NOT allowed to protect yourself against someone with an illegal weapon. You are NOT to protect the life of family members or your property. Everything with personal protection has to be after-the-fact… You have to let someone put you or your family in hospital with sometimes massive injuries or have your property stolen with the promise that the police will turn up (they don’t) or that the judiciary will deal with them (and we all know that when the law and justice meet, it is purely by accident).

    So… the people who create the laws are sure to bow to the wishes of the people (when they steadfastly refuse to do it now) in creating more laws that define in black and white what behaviour a responsible, mature adult should display when holding the mantle of public office and representing the people. Considering that the laws they make now exist purely to rake in revenue from taxes on taxes (fraud!) and an almost 1960’s Catholic church-like behaviour of shuffling people around when one of their own commits a crime.

    MP’s cry: “We deserve high pay because we could make so much more in private practice!” Sorry people – but I would like to know anyone shovelling shit that makes what you do because your lacks of ethics, honour, skills, and anything else that is relevant in business makes you even under-qualified to perform that role with any competence.

    From where I stand, Julia(r) Gillard and her ilk regard the Australian taxpayer as nothing more than peasants to the aristocracy — there to pay taxes to support them in the lifestyle to which they have become accustomed. This last bit is quite funny considering that the ALP considers itself to be the party that stands up for the working man, yet screws over the working man and woman at every juncture – and is manned by people who have not done a day of hard work in their lives and would not know what a blister even feels like. Proof? Handing over water to outside companies (mates?) who constantly jack up the rates… Handing over electricity and gas to outside companies (mates?) who constantly jack up the rates…. Changing the law to subvert the Westminster System and allow greed cameras to declare you as guilty with you needing to prove your innocence in a court of law…. Screwing over the people when it comes time to “negotiate” pay rises — eg 2-3% for the people but they vote themselves double-digit every 2 years or so.

    Holy crap… I just saw the length of this reply…. :p

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s